Galileo And Newton

Galileo and Newton


2/4/97


     Galileo believed the physical world to be bounded.  He says that all

material things have "this or that shape" and are small or large in relation to

other things.  He also says that material objects are either in motion or at

rest,  touching or not touching some other body, and are either one in number,

or many.  The central properties of the material world are mathematical and

strengthened through experimentation.  Galileo excludes the properties of tastes,

odors, colors, and so on when describing the material world.  He states that

these properties "reside only in the consciousness."  These latter properties

would cease to exist without the living creature so the mathematically defined

properties are the most accurate in describing the material world.  Galileo

seems to test his beliefs through experimentation and mathematical reasoning.

He sites examples in life that support his hypothesis.  His argument is of a

scientific nature because he is making a hypothesis on a distinctive type of

concept.  The conclusions that Galileo made relate directly to the work in

physics for which he is so well known.  His conclusions put emphasis on shapes,

numbers, and motion which are all properties that lend themselves to support

through "reasoning back and forth between theory and experiment."  I feel that

Galileo's argument is a valid one because it explains relations in nature and

the physical world through mathematical analysis.  This allows him to define a

world outside of human existence that can be logically calculated and explained.

His view describes the world in which living creatures live and not contrasts it

to the world within living creatures.  The problem with Galileo's view is that

it pioneers a scientific outlook but never actually fulfills it.

     Newton believes the world is ultimately made up of hard particles that

can retain different properties.  The central properties are solid, massy,

impenetrable, and movable particles.  He believes God created matter in the

beginning in such a way to allow the particles to take on mathematical forms.

His approach is a scientific one because he practices the continual interaction

of experiment and theory.  It is the hard particles that move in such a way that

can be assigned certain mathematical principles that clearly explain the

interaction of bodies.  Newton's conclusion seems to be a strong one because it

deals with the world being made up of particles and shows how these particles

act with each other in a way that can be explained scientifically.  I like the

idea of organized flow in the world and God being the creator of it all.   The

mathematical/scientific approach offers explanation to how the particles are

moving.  Galileo and Newton differ in certain aspects of their understanding of

the physical world.  Galileo doesn't put much emphasis on the role of creativity

in science.  Newton believes in the mathematical and experimentation outlook of

science pioneered by Galileo but he believed that new concepts are the product

of creative imagination.  He felt that math should explain the concepts imagined.

 Newton extended ideas pioneered by Galileo on issues of forces, masses, shapes,

and forms.  Newton didn't feel that the scientific theory needed to answer every

question asked about a phenomenon in order to be useful.

     Galileo and Newton make a strong argument for the lack of purposes or

values in nature.  Their scientific minds sought answers on a logical scale.

They could analyze the material world through calculations and in this math was

suitable explanation.  In theThis is ONLY a preview of the article. If you would like to view the entire document, you must subscribe to Electronic References. Please register below now!


Get This Full Article After Registration



When you subscribe to Electronic References, you get complete access to the meta-collection of full text articles and papers written by researchers and students spanning the last 5 years. For $19.95 a month, you will receive unlimited access and the ability to expand your research opportunities and knowledge.

This subscription package includes:

24-hours-a-day, 7 days a week unlimited access on any computer with Internet access
Complete access to all 60,000 articles, essays, and research papers
Ability to view, save, print and download any document you find
Ability to browse through perfectly arranged catalog of articles
Superior search and relevancy ranking techniques using our optimalized search engine
Instant access to the online database after registration


You can pay by credit card or checking account. You get instant access after registration:




1 Month ($ 19.95)
3 Months ($ 29.95)
6 Months ($ 39.95)





You will be billed $19.95 every 30 days or $29.95 every 90 days (recurring billing) starting on the day you subscribe.

Your credit card or checking account will automatically be renewed for your convenience until you cancel.