Capital Punishment

Capital Punishment


     After centuries of nearly universal implementation, the death penalty

remains a deeply debated political issue. While one execution takes place, other

murders occur, and the question still stands: Will the death penalty safeguard

society and deter murder, or will it not? The death penalty cannot be considered

a proper economical and moral means of punishment to deter those who might

commit capital offenses, or can it?


     In the past, capital punishment horrified people, which deterred them

from committing crime. In England, the country from which the United States

adopted the death penalty, the death penalty was imposed for a rather large

number of offenses in an effort to discourage people from committing crimes.

Methods of inflicting the death penalty have ranged "From stoning in biblical

times, crucifixion under the Romans, beheading in France, to those used in the

United States today: hanging, electrocution, gas chamber, firing squad, and

lethal injection"(Bedau 124). There were drastic penalties for such serious

crimes as homicide. Execution was a suitable punishment for those times. Today,

though, the law is not as strict. This leads potential criminals not to fear the

death penalty because government today uses more "humane" methods of execution,

rather than the brutal punishment that history portrayed.


     People who oppose the death penalty say that "there is no evidence that

the murder rate fluctuates according to the frequency with which the death

penalty is used" (Masur 153). It is more likely that the convict would be

paroled instead of being executed because of the present practice of allowing

unlimited appeals. Convicted criminals are not exposed to cruel punishment, but

rather given a long waiting period. If the criminal is put to death, it is

usually done as mercifully as possible.


     One problem with the death penalty, presently, is that crime is not

decreasing, but rather increasing. If capital punishment is supposed to deter

crimes such as murder, it is not serving its purpose. Even philosophers, such as

Beccaria, Voltaire, and Bentham of the Enlightenment Period, argued that "the

death penalty was needlessly cruel, overrated as a deterent, and occasionally

imposed in fatal error" (Fogelson 89).


     Another problem with the death penalty is the enormous amount of money

being spent on implementation. It costs taxpayers millions of dollars more to

execute a criminal than to lock him up for life. The number of prisoners on

death row has been steadily increasing and will soon meet all time highs. This

fact brings up the question of economic feasibility of the implementation, as

well as the question of weather the death penalty is actually an effective

deterrent to crime.


     Currently, Texas leads the nation in both death row population and in

the number of executions. Texas has 351 condemned men and 4 women awaiting

sentence, and has had 46 executions since 1977. These prisoners spent an average

of eight years on death row and cost Texans an average of 2.3 million dollars

per case ("Execution" B8). The legal process a condemned prisoner goes through

is very lengthy and costly.


     A person is only given the death penalty for certain crimes in Texas. A

death sentence is handed down if a person is convicted of the murder of a police

officer or fireman, murder during certain felonies, murder for pay or reward,

multiple murders, or murder during prison escape. Once a criminal has been

sentenced, he or she can appeal the decision.


     In addition to the courts appeals, the cost of an average of $180,000

per case, the $150,000 prison cost also escalates the economic burden to the

state. This cost does not include the $21,000 execution cost or the $19,500

needed for extra security (Van den Haag 123). To have a death row prisoner means

that the state must provide police, fire, and public safety protection. They

also require special housing units, extra guards, food, and around-the-clock

security (Van den Haag 123).


     To cut down costs, several alternativThis is ONLY a preview of the article. If you would like to view the entire document, you must subscribe to Electronic References. Please register below now!


Get This Full Article After Registration



When you subscribe to Electronic References, you get complete access to the meta-collection of full text articles and papers written by researchers and students spanning the last 5 years. For $19.95 a month, you will receive unlimited access and the ability to expand your research opportunities and knowledge.

This subscription package includes:

24-hours-a-day, 7 days a week unlimited access on any computer with Internet access
Complete access to all 60,000 articles, essays, and research papers
Ability to view, save, print and download any document you find
Ability to browse through perfectly arranged catalog of articles
Superior search and relevancy ranking techniques using our optimalized search engine
Instant access to the online database after registration


You can pay by credit card or checking account. You get instant access after registration:




1 Month ($ 19.95)
3 Months ($ 29.95)
6 Months ($ 39.95)





You will be billed $19.95 every 30 days or $29.95 every 90 days (recurring billing) starting on the day you subscribe.

Your credit card or checking account will automatically be renewed for your convenience until you cancel.